UAP NInsiders can’t just “leak” everything, so stop saying they should

I have seen this topic come up seemingly once each day, with somebody on this sub saying something to the effect of “Why don’t the whistleblowers/insiders with knowledge of UFO/UAP SAP just leak everything that isn’t literally illegal?”

The answer is simple: this would literally be the opposite of progress. This would set the movement back incalculably. This would be the real life equivalent of playing a poker game with the mafia and blurting out mid-hand that you have a straight flush — you’d probably be dead before you laid the cards on the table, whether you were bluffing or not, and even if they didn’t whack you, you would walk out of there empty handed, because they can just change the rules to their own benefit anytime they want. And nobody would ever believe a word of your story outside of that room anyway.

Whether or not publicly leaking would be literal death for a whistleblower (which it certainly could, see: https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/12/business/former-boeing-whistleblower-dies/index.html), it would also completely undercut their credibility in the eyes of the non-initiated public; David Grusch testified under oath that he has direct knowledge of these programs existing, and of the US government and DoD having connections to reverse engineering of advanced nonhuman technology. How does the populous at large respond? “He is either crazy, misinformed, or a bit of both,” even though none of his opposition has testified to the contrary (particularly under oath), save for the typical ‘we have found no evidence’ line that Kirkpatrick so frequently leaned on.

Leaking to Coulthart or another sympathetic journalist would only deepen this distrust of a guy (Ross) who has said repeatedly that he knows things he can’t say. And a lot of people already question the things that he does say. Leaking to sympathetic news organizations wouldn’t do much more. Sharing photos, videos, etc… would all just be “debunked” by members of this sub in a matter of minutes.

People in this community with extensive background and knowledge on the topic have been critical of the insiders, while also acknowledging that they can’t simply throw their information on a news program and expect it to change the world. Take opposing figures like Elizondo and Greenewald; they don’t see eye to eye, but I also don’t think that either would recommend just throwing all of your cards on the table when your opponent is essentially the largest Cartel on planet earth: the US gov.