Bet you dime to a dollar looking into the contributors of these congress people will demonstrate their allegiances.
This is how they do it, get members of Congress close to the military and CIA to derail the momentum of disclosure.
It’s called backlash.
Many of us knew it would come. I think the fact that not long after that Congressional Grusch exposure hearing Congress just happened to go bananas and threw out the then-speaker.
Of course, I have no proof these events were connected and it’s a conspiracy theory, granted, but a backlash against the Congress may have been in the works.
Quote from the article below:
“Bipartisan legislation sponsored by Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) aimed to establish a process with the ostensible goal of revealing the existence of “non-human intelligence” to the public. But the legislation, which is co-sponsored by three Republican and two Democratic senators, is now in jeopardy.
In comments yesterday on the Senate floor, Schumer stated that “House Republicans are also attempting to kill another commonsense, bipartisan measure passed by the Senate, which I was proud to cosponsor… to increase transparency around what the government does and does not know about unidentified aerial phenomena.”
According to reports, Rep. Mike Turner (R-Ohio), chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, and Rep. Mike Rogers (R-Ala.), chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, are leading efforts to prevent any meaningful version of this provision from being added to the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act.
Members of Congress generally clamor for enhanced government oversight — a core function of the legislative branch — and transparency. So what could cause a small group of influential lawmakers to suddenly resist it?”
submitted by /u/Snoo-26902
[link] [comments]