As a lawyer, I’d like to remind everyone to pay close attention to the words and phrases used in the new report…

Submission statement:

Admittedly, I didn’t read the entire new report for lack of time.

But in the snippets and executive summary I’ve seen, many highly suspicious and undefined buzzwords are used. This follows the same pattern as all prior reports.

“No CREDIBLE evidence”:

Credible according to whom?

No evidence of “EXTRATERRESTRIAL”…

What about something potentially terrestrial or inter-dimensional in nature?

In sum, just as with all prior reports, these terms are thrown around in sentences and paragraphs that, at first glance, appear to reach firm conclusions. In actuality, these terms are meaningless as they remain wholly speculative for so long as they remain undefined. Thus, entire report says absolutely nothing of value and says nothing on which any rational reader could reach a conclusion regarding the government’s historic involvement with UAP.

In fact, the continued focus on and use of these specific words is highly suspicious. They’re pure weasel words that mean nothing whatsoever in the context of the larger picture of this issue.