A big reason why I suspect this topic is so hard to disclose:

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

This sounds like something I’ve heard before, so apologies if this isn’t a completely new thought.

In thinking about reasons about why the subject of UAP and NHI haven’t been shared with the general population, I came to a thought of how this topic might just be so large, that it will be incredibly hard to divulge.

To use an analogy, think of the invention/discovery of electricity and the invention of the combustion engine. Just to use a round number, let’s say that it’s been 70 years (1950s) since we have had some kind of understanding of UAP:

Thomas Edison invented his version of the light bulb in the 1880s, and in 70 years, the first “modern” computers were starting to be utilized around Europe. George Brayton invented the first commercial liquid-fuelled internal combustion engine in 1872, and in just under 70 years, the ‘Heinkel He 178’ became the world’s first jet aircraft.

Both of these inventions, as we all know, were used to advance almost all scientific fields, which the same would definitely be true about UAP technology as well. In the shoes of someone that lived centuries ago, the invention of the engine and harnessing of electricity would have truly seemed like magic. Today, many of us understand the science behind them, so they don’t seem like magic anymore.

Here is where the difficulty comes in:

I suspect, whenever our first exposure to this realm of technology took place (i.e. a crash retrieval), of course those in charge ordered the study of such technology before they talked about what it is publicly. Otherwise, especially understandably in the time of the cold war, people really would panic if they assumed it belonged to their enemies, which would mean they are vastly more advanced. What the people studying the technology wouldn’t realize at the time though, are the vast implications of the concepts surrounding it.

I truly believe, as many “ufologists” say, that the story is absolutely massive. That what was learned would truly seem like magic, just as electricity would have seemed as well when it was first utilized.

So in the realization that more research was needed in order to be able to give the public an actual understanding of the concepts of some of the technology, they kept it under wraps. I suspect this happened many more times as the rabbit hole would have kept getting deeper. Which is where we are now after decades of research has been done, after so much of this “magic” has been able to be studied.

If this is true, the decision to delay disclosure for this long is definitely a mistake, and I think they would know this. This delay would have benefited the weapons companies vastly in their monopolization and hoarding of this technology, but for the general public I think this wouldn’t have been the best option. The reason being, is that I’m sure we will find out that there have been projects and operations that have been going on without our knowledge, and learning about just how many there have been will frustrate us and cause distrust of those in charge (but of course that’s nothing new).

I wonder if the reason that it seems we are moving closer to disclosure (of course not without its hindrances) is because we have a complete understanding of the technology, and the methods of teaching the public. Or is it because the pot has simply boiled over so much that they might as well just tell us about it now, since it will only keep getting harder for us to understand as future studies keep uncovering more information.

This is where the origin of “woo” comes from:

In history, we always attribute things we don’t understand as a kind of “woo”, being gods, magic, etc..

The reasons that made electricity seem like magic almost certainly also exist with the science surrounding UAPs. I personally think there definitely is a consciousness aspect to all of this, but I don’t think it will be as whimsical as some people believe. “Harnessing” consciousness to drive a craft might just be a way to simplify the piloting process and make it more approachable and intuitive for pilots. Things like remote viewing probably also have a better explanation other than we are special and have a kind of “superpower” (sorry if that sounds condescending, I don’t mean it to).

To kind of bring it all together, the fact that disclosure has been delayed for this long will only exacerbate the feeling of frustration and overwhelm us more in the end. Although, the technology and concepts surrounding UAP and NHI will be something that all of us will be able to understand if we take the time to do so.

submitted by /u/DaZipp
[link] [comments] 

Read More