I have seen some people post on the sub not fully grasping why “catastrophic disclosure” should be avoided, and that any disclosure would be “good disclosure.” I decided to illustrate a few scenarios. I am very sorry on the length of this post, and not providing a real TL;DR, but I’ve been interested in this topic since the first News Nation interview and have been lurking in this sub ever since. I hope I provide some meaningful thoughts on why catastrophic disclosure is a problem.
—
HOW IT HAPPENS:
Scenario 1: A large UAP uncloaks itself in daylight over a large metropolitan area at 8am EST. Let’s assume the metropolitan area is NYC, for simplicity’s sake.
Initially, there is chaos. When the UAP first reveals itself, the sudden appearance causes a distraction leading to multiple motor vehicle accidents in NYC directly in view of the craft. People begin to have varied responses to the situation, as humans are wont to do: Some panic, assuming an “Independence Day”-like scenario. Some are logical, but fearful. Some stay in their homes, watching the TV, awaiting news. Those who panic may start reacting violently; general fear and unrest magnifies like a wildfire in NYC. Some people may start breaking out into riots, looting, which snowballs in the most hotspot areas.
Meanwhile, the entire world focuses on the craft. It fills every news station. From minute to minute, people wonder what is going on. Families may keep their kids home from school, or not go into work. Such large numbers of upset to the day to day routine causes a backup in general workflow – there is not enough IT professionals to fix the problem with this network issue in a hospital, leading to failure of the hospital to function well. An electrical grid in a neighborhood in the UK goes down, but there aren’t enough linemen to fix it immediately. Supply chains begin to be disrupted, a la the COVID lockdowns, leading to shortages down the road of various goods. Some stores don’t open. It causes ripple effects throughout multiple – nay, every – community in the world to some degree, all beginning in these first minutes.
A cult decides to go through with a suicide pact. A mentally disturbed individual tries to open fire on the craft, leading to immediate violence in a public area that obfiscuates into a mass shooting incident. Military across the world are scrambled to contain the population and the craft.
With any hint of imagination, the scenario has already started a flow that can be predicted to some degree. Depending on how the following minutes progress will depend on the general amount of damage done. However…
—>
People begin to point fingers. What was it? Who knows about it? The unknown sparks fear, and fear sparks distrust. The public across the world look to their governments. Morning news shows begin to pull up old interviews – was all of this real in the first place? The Phoenix Lights, the 1994 Zimbabwe incident, from the seemingly plausible events to outright grifter rants. Did the government know? People start to whisper that they did – after all, weren’t there those whistleblower hearings in July? They knew, yet they didn’t tell us? We called all these people crazy – so what was real, and what was false? Suddenly no one is quite sure what the truth was anymore. Perhaps truth has no real meaning at this point. People form their own conclusions, some for the better or worse.
Over time, the world begins to mistrust its authority figures. Civil war breaks out in some of the more unstable areas. People begin protesting on the front steps of universities. Underneath the silent craft, someone put up a shrine and has been praying to it.
At worst, the chaos ripples out and disturbs everything it touches, leading to great upheavals in authority, government, and stability – economic systems collapse. The supply chain issues, which once seemed trivial, now means a starving populace in pockets across the world. The ones affected first were the ones who were already experiencing a lack of food accessibility – but now… Now everything has been amplified to 11. Cities in the coldest parts of the world don’t have enough energy to heat their homes.
People die.
Imagine this continues on, uncontrolled, leading to the entire collapse of modern society. That is absolutely the worst case scenario. The craft continues on, silent, but visible.
Yet… Let’s imagine a situation less dire. What else could catastrophic disclosure look like?
Scenario 2: Perhaps another nation – let’s imagine Russia – comes forward with a great breakthrough in UAP technology. They have a weapon that dwarfs the nuclear warhead and that weapon is going to win them the war in Ukraine. They seek the power they lost after the fall of the USSR. The people in charge feel like they have nothing to lose.
They unleash the impossible weapon on the people of Ukraine.
The EU is in shock, the United States – the West, fighting this proxy war – has to get involved. Yet how is this weapon’s appearance explained? People begin to come forward. Now go back to where my arrow points at the previous paragraph. Now, there is a hot war going on in this situation. WWIII is on the horizon, now.
Perhaps that is an even darker take than the prior one. Perhaps if I bring up something more innocuous…
Scenario 3: China decides to come forward with the information. The president delivers a well rehearsed speech to its people, but the entire world listens in. “We have this technology,” they say. “Your governments across the world lied to you. But here we are, telling you what your own government didn’t trust you with. How can you believe in your elected officials after this betrayal?” The speech continues on, about how this technology benefits the world, and how China will enter into agreements with various countries, on their terms, to share it.
What happens then? Does the US sit idly by as people argue amongst themselves? This is clean energy that can fix all of our problems. Why won’t we implement it? Did we really have it, and we didn’t say anything? Cue the arrow (—>).
We have to control the narrative to a point. People must be introduced slowly, carefully, to prevent general societal upheaval – which, supposedly, is the reason the CIA decided in 2003 to keep this information hidden. We have systems that are deeply entrenched in every aspect of life (industry, methodologies of thought, belief, financial) that can be completely overturned in the wrong setting. I feel like COVID was a good practice run for what a (relatively) small thing can turn into. Regardless of your own thoughts on COVID, people did not trust one another, did not trust scientific officials, elected officials, or people working in the hospitals themselves. People pointed the finger at Chinese immigrants and performed hate crimes. People picketed against vaccinations while others died on ventilators. Supply chains were disrupted for months. Our current financial woes are largely blamed on COVID as the starting point, whether or not the “inflation” is really entirely all their is to it. The fallout from catastrophic disclosure would be just that – catastrophic. It has to be avoided. We have to use “kid gloves.”
submitted by /u/Aiyakiu
[link] [comments]