Advice please

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

​

If you had 30 minutes to talk to an extremely skeptical friend about UAPs, what are the major talking points you would hit?

I have watched documentaries, listened to podcasts, read documents, read books, listened to Grusch’s testimony, followed social media – and the amount of information (and disinformation) out in the world is overwhelming.

Off the cuff I simply can’t explain the current state of UAP research, the history (especially in the US and the government agencies, and programs like Skunkworks), along with the alphabet soup of acronyms associated with agencies new and old.

Additionally, there are so many big “names” associated in the UAP field, who are the most reputable? And who are considered frauds?

Many thanks for your collective assistance.

submitted by /u/Inishmore12
[link] [comments] 

​Read More