Diana Walsh Pasulka

I have taken a deep dive on this researcher recently and a few things send out at least yellow flags for me. I have read her book, watched her interviews, and watch her talk at the Sol Foundation.The first is that, in American Cosmic, she starts with the conclusion that UFOs are a new religion, with no real background dara to draw this conclusion, then works backwards to (weakly) characterize it as such. Granted, there is absolutely a vendiagram overlap between religious experience and the phenomenon, but it’s not a 1:1.

Her way of thinking reminded me of a study I part took in during my undergrad in anthropology. The professor drew some conclusions before we started the project and all of his cronies looking to get an A in his class try their best to find confirmation data rather than trying to disprove his hypothesis like real scientists. She very much comes across this way to me.

She also seems to rather muddy the waters by calling herself not an expert, presenting herself as an outsider, but also claiming tremendous access to people at high levels. She claims to have held some sort of artifact that she does not describe at all in her book. That was highly disappointing especially when she went on Joe Rogan and spilled her guts about the ‘frogskin”.

Garry Nolan, who was supposedly there at the “crash site”, disavows any existence of any artifact. The person in the book referred to as Tyler has also been doxed at this point, yet she acts like it’s all still a secret. It seems like her level of secrecy, use of pseudonyms, and coherent thoughts related to the phenomena are all over the place.

Basically everything I’ve seen her involved in makes me think that something funny is going on here. I’m not sure what, but my suspicion is that she is being used as some sort of “useful idiot” for the powers that be. She also has a definitive agenda to link the phenomenon with her own personal Catholic beliefs and claim that belief in a religion and belief in UFOs are the same thing. It is an interesting hypothesis, but she never really proves her point, but rather dances around makes vague statements, and brags about her access.

She claims nothing she is privy to is classified since she is a citizen, yet says for “national security” she can’t tell us what she knows. And of course she knows more than she saying it present but may reveal things in the future. Same typical marketing BS we see from people like Corbel.

This is all coming from someone who is not a skeptic on the subject and has seen it UFO up close in person with another witness and broad daylight. So don’t dismiss me simply as being a skeptic, rather I’m a skeptic of ol’ DW. It almost feels like she is intentionally trying to muddy the waters of the UFO field of study.

Feel free to dispute or discuss on genuinely interested in how she came across to anyone else who’s done this sort of research on her. To me something doesn’t pass the smell test.