Some people asking valid questions
How can multiple governments keep this a secret, and what is the motive? Why is USA hiding everything under ‘National Security’? Why are we dancing around confirming aliens but use later terms like NHI?
These questions are stumpers if you assume the truth is that Aliens visit earth or have.
However if you assume that this isn’t aliens, and just an advanced craft that the USA has, everything makes sense. They already confirmed they have worked or have working technology.
How can multiple governments keep this a secret, and what is the motive?
If the advanced technology belongs to the USA, it’s in their interest to maintain secrecy. By controlling the narrative, they can prevent other nations from realizing that these are not extraterrestrial crafts but human-made advanced technology. This maintains a strategic advantage in global geopolitics and military technology.
Why is the USA hiding everything under ‘National Security’?
The classification of these phenomena as matters of ‘National Security’ serves a dual purpose. First, it legitimizes the secrecy and lack of public disclosure. Second, it protects the technical details of the craft from becoming public knowledge, which could potentially enable other countries or non-state actors to develop similar technologies. The USA’s primary goal is to confirm the existence of these crafts without revealing any technical details that could compromise their technological superiority.
Why are we dancing around confirming aliens but use later terms like Non-Human Intelligence (NHI)?
The ambiguity in terminology serves as a smokescreen. By neither confirming nor denying the extraterrestrial origin, the USA can operate these crafts in global airspace with plausible deniability. Terms like NHI allow for a broad interpretation, creating a perfect cover story for testing or deploying these advanced crafts, even in enemy territories, without direct political repercussions. The narrative of potential extraterrestrial involvement also diverts attention from the possibility of these being highly advanced human-made technologies.
Why would they reveal selective videos of it, vaguely confirm its existence, but stop short of truly confirming its existence?
By releasing selective videos and acknowledging the existence of these unidentified objects without providing concrete explanations, the U.S. government creates a controlled narrative. This tactic fosters a level of public awareness and intrigue without divulging sensitive information. The vague confirmation serves as a strategic misdirection, keeping the focus on extraterrestrial theories while concealing the true nature of these technologies. Those with access to Special Access Programs (SAPs) may be aware of the actual origins and capabilities of these crafts but are bound by strict confidentiality agreements, ensuring that this knowledge remains within a limited circle.
How do these actions benefit the strategic interests of the USA?
By maintaining a veil of mystery around these sightings, the USA can leverage these incidents for various strategic purposes. This could include testing foreign defense systems’ responses to unknown aerial objects, gauging public reaction to potential threats, and diverting attention from other military or intelligence activities. The ambiguity also allows for psychological operations, where the perceived technological superiority could serve as a deterrent to potential adversaries.
What role does media play in shaping public perception of these phenomena?
The media often amplifies the mystery and speculation surrounding these sightings. Sensational reporting and the focus on extraterrestrial angles can obscure the possibility of these being advanced military technologies. This media portrayal can be advantageous for the government, as it diverts public and international attention away from considering more mundane, yet highly classified, technological advancements.
How is international cooperation or lack thereof involved in this narrative?
If these technologies are indeed a product of U.S. innovation, it would explain the reluctance to engage in open, international discussions about these phenomena. Acknowledging these objects as domestic military assets would require addressing international treaties, airspace violations, and potentially sparking an arms race. Keeping allies and adversaries alike in the dark preserves the strategic advantage.
What implications does this have for global military balance and security?
If the narrative of advanced U.S. technology posing as UFOs is true, it significantly impacts global military balance. The mere existence of such technology, unknown and unmatched by other nations, could shift the power dynamics. It raises questions about arms control, space militarization, and the potential for a new kind of arms race, centered not just on nuclear or conventional weapons, but on unacknowledged, cutting-edge technologies.
submitted by /u/ForumlaUser3000
[link] [comments]