I’m not sure if this is too off topic, but I’ve seen a lot of people misinterpreting things being said on metabunk regarding the Jellyfish UAP.
I really think everyone should read through it and be keeping updated on what is being said, both for more information and so you can accurately push back against their claims, instead of falling into name calling and arguing against things they themselves don’t believe.
The bird poop theory was just that, a theory, some guys speculating in a thread on possible options it’s an option they all seem to agree is unlikely at this stage. (And we have folks speculating here that its a 3d representation of a 4d object, it’s only fair that the other group goes the opposite route.)
Right now they are looking into balloons, I think this is unlikely personally, and much like the bird poo, their own work may disprove that hypothesis.
Now I don’t think the majority of users there will accept UAP as an answer, but that doesn’t mean the work they are doing to analyse the video is inherently worthless.
So for anyone interested in getting a larger set of ideas and options, maybe check it out.
As a bonus, they also uploaded the video onto a tool they have on their site. It allows for zooming and panning, editing brightness/saturation, colour overlays, just some cool stuff: https://www.metabunk.org/sitrec/?sitch=video&video=Jellyfish – I think the intent of the tool is to find evidence of this not being a UAP, but damn if it isn’t looking interesting to my eyes.
Edit: I done goofed some of me words and sentence structure..es. It’s legible, I’m too tired to proof read any more.
submitted by /u/URFRENDDULUN
[link] [comments]