Letter to the editor: the “Likely CGI” tag feels a whole lot like Kirkpatrick’s comments prematurely dismissing potential evidence as unverifiable and therefore unworthy of attempting to verify further.

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , regarding (565) , issue (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

​

Just seems a little hypocritical, given the general attitude on this sub towards hubristic condescenders like Kirkpatrick.

That kind of tag is just as bias-instilling and misleading as the pictures of Grusch that the media has been using where he looks goofy

If it’s fake, the truth will out and open discussion will only hasten that process. The tag only muddies the waters and paints a slant on opinions before they even enter the discussion

submitted by /u/oat_milk
[link] [comments] 

​Read More