Mainstream media – legal implications of disclosure

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

As we’re all aware, the mainstream media has been largely silent on the topic. Assuming the allegations are true (if you’re here, I assume you agree) and the editors come to the same conclusion, I wonder if there is concern on their part about potential legal implications of a groundbreaking article/news segment.

I truly feel we are on the 1-yard line as far as evidence and widespread acceptance. I’d have to assume any editor presented with convincing evidence/material would have to then contemplate the implications of publishing such material. With events like “war of the worlds” in mind, do you think there are any legal hurdles or risks on behalf of major outlets to publishing what could be a major article on the topic. Wondering if any of you may have insight into this or if it is truly just a lack of faith in the topic fueling the silence

I genuinely feel like we are just one of these events away from serious progress being made

submitted by /u/Zealousideal-Rub1762
[link] [comments] 

Read More