Looking at the MH370 Inmarsat logs that were released in 2017 to try and pinpoint the time the aircraft was near the Nicobar Islands and the “orb portal event” occurred, I noticed that something strange had occurred in the logs half an hour before the aircraft took off and also during the period when the aircraft may have been in the Nicobar Island locality.
The Inmarsat IOR / POR overlap
https://mh370.radiantphysics.com/2017/07/04/some-insights-from-the-unredacted-satellite-logs/
As the image above shows, Kuala Lumpur is right on the edge of the POR satellite coverage. The data that was released by Malaysian Airlines covered the aircraft’s (Airframe 9M-MRO) previous flight MH371 from Beijing to Kuala Lumpur, on the morning of March 7, 2014. The aircraft took off at 16:30 UTC on March 7 2014 on the return MH370 flight, which, as we know, never made its destination.
MH371 (Beijing – Kuala Lumpur) and MH370 (Kuala Lumpur – Beijing) flight path
During the previous MH371 flight, the aircraft’s satcom unit switched between the POR and IOR satellites, picking the one with the best signal strength/signal-to-noise ratio:
However, whilst the aircraft was still sitting on the tarmac at Kuala Lumpur, it suddenly switched to IOR at 15:59:46 UTC and remained fixed on that satellite for the remainder of the flight, which took off half an hour later at 16:30 UTC on March 7, 2014.
POR/IOR switchover on the tarmac (Column 5, SU Log Tab)
This is in stark contrast to a few hours prior when the aircraft had landed and was being cleaned and refueled for the return journey:
Turnaround on tarmac frequently switches satellites (Column 5, SU Log Tab)
The satcom modem remained locked on IOR for the remainder of the ill-fated MH370 flight, despite initially following the intended flight path to Beijing. The “IOR only” data subsequently limited the ability to use Doppler calculations on the data packet Burst Frequency Offset (BFO) between the aircraft, the satellite, and the ground station:
Inmarsat Doppler correction explanation
Inmarsat analysis of BFO to determine possible search arcs
Dr. Victor Iannello, a physicist from the United States and his colleagues have done an amazing job analyzing the data for 9 years and has a very informative website for those interested. The following information about the provenance of the data makes for interesting reading:
https://mh370.radiantphysics.com/2017/06/12/the-unredacted-inmarsat-satellite-data-for-mh370/
The unredacted data can be found here:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/hk3khtsmiy83y9i/35200217%20Logs%20for%20SITA%2008Mar2014%28p%29.xlsx?dl=0
As for the data around the time the aircraft was possibly near the Nicobar Islands, I found the following:
I definitely think something strange going on here, but I’d like to get other people’s opinions.
It appears that the satcom modem MIGHT have been interfered with half an hour before takeoff, manipulating the high gain antenna to only TX/RX with the IOR satellite. This would mean a deliberate plan was in place PRIOR to its disappearance (which reminds me of the Air New Zealand Mt Erebus crash, which Ross Coulthart worked on in his early legal career).
The anomaly with the lack of log-ons/ handshakes around the time period that the “orbs and portal” incident occurred probably requires deeper analysis too.
I’m banned from posting on r/UFOs (not sure why), but feel free to crosspost if necessary.
submitted by /u/Harry_is_white_hot
[link] [comments]
