First off, this is pure speculation born out of an off-hand reply to a thread a few days back, and having my Saturday night plans cancelled so I figured I’d share as a thought exercise.
A lot of folks understandably keep asking for first-hand witnesses to come forward hoping that can settle disclosure definitively. However, the more I’ve thought about it and how the secret has been maintained the likelihood that a hands-on operator within the program is aware of what they’re working on is probably slim and makes it easier to refute their claims if they were to come forward.
It’s what makes certain LARPS so transparent, when an individual can wax poetic about the complex web of the overall program while alleging to have only worked in a section of it.
We tend to imagine a banged up, but mostly intact UAP sitting in a hangar somewhere being crawled over by a dozen men in white hazmat suits. Rumors of intact craft by reputable, and less than reputable, figures further stokes that vision.
However, if that were the case I would have to side with skeptics given that over decades those in the know starts to grow exponentially and the risk of a Snowden becomes more likely.
That said, Grusch has pointed to the over compartmentalization of the program as a reason why some on the inside want disclosure, because the way things are has stymied progress.
It got me to thinking that in all likelihood the people working on the program are likely working on small pieces of tech under cover of recovered foreign tech, and to a degree of specificity that if even they began to suspect something otherworldly it would be very difficult to prove.
For instance, say a chemist within a compartmented program examining the composition of a three inch piece of metal. Told by superiors it’s part of an engine casing from a recovered Russian drone while in reality it’s a piece of UAP propulsion tech. Similarly other specializations are studying the other pieces in an equally myopic manner.
With no way of communicating or knowing other compartments exist with the additional pieces, even suspecting they’re working on NHI tech, there’s very little to blow the whistle on. They run the risk of breaching an NDA and losing all their clearances, benefits, and potentially face jailtime or worse on a hunch. Not only that if they did come out other people on the program that wholeheartedly believe they’re working on foreign tech could be allowed to speak up to discredit the whisleblower and no one would be the wiser.
I know I make the mistake of believing these folks ONLY work on NHI stuff and don’t leave room for the very real possibility it’s just lumped in with other conventional work within their compartment.
Now I will concede Grusch has said he’s spoken to first hand witnesses but given how little we know about them, what they worked on etc. I think both instances can exist. It doesn’t mean some people haven’t figured it out, or worked on a biologic that made it impossible to not know, but I would assume still that number remains small and if what Grusch is being truthful, already have come forward.
All to say I personally think the number of first-hand witnesses that can irrefutably testify to working on NHI tech or biologics is probably very small. I don’t think this is anything particularly new in terms of thinking but it floated to the top of my mind in seeing how much skeptics just want first hand witness accounts, but I don’t think there’s many –or that it will be as open and shut as some believe were they to circumvent legal channels to blow the whistle.
submitted by /u/HengShi
[link] [comments]