New Theory: AI Power Consumption/Requirement Forces Disclosure of Reverse Engineering

I read alot on the topic of AI and Reverse Engineering. I also have had alot life experience in multiple power generation markets. (coal, gas, hydro, wind, solar) as well as extraction of these carbon based fuels. Also I was privy to how global rotating equipment manufacturers forsee the possible use of Hydrogen moving forward.

First I’ll go into my current interpretation of how NHI, AI, and world affairs relative to the requirement of energy.

My Current Theory:

In the end I believe that the term “Darkness” that “in the know” people use to describe the government recovery program is the fact that we have been lead astray, knowingly, by the US Gov that there is a alternative, relatively endless source for power generation that would alleviate most of the societal and environment issues that we have.

I believe that they found the foundation for relatively endless energy in the 50’s and they chose to suppress it to have an advantage over foreign powers. A decision that was made by dead people that we continue today…

At this moment rotational based machine technology energy generation is the most efficient means that we can apply to a broad geographical range. Motors people…

Take a minute to think about how many people have died via world conflicts for the control of carbon fuel. Then CIA is specifically focused on the rich lands of the Middle East, South America, Asia and portions of Africa. The CIA involvement in molding these governments via the pressure of war or simply planting thier in thier own heads of power in these areas in astounding.

The US is going to be forced to publicly explain how they are creating power and the requirement to have abundant energy is rapidly arriving. Possibly via a giant server bank in 2027? Makes more sense than multiple (malevolent/benevolent) NHI forcing human intelligence to disclose…just saying…

Quick Concepts of Energy for Reference:

I am going to plainly state my thoughts on the materials for power from the plant level and extraction level. That is where I have had years of experience. I have no political agenda on power and just think of it from an efficency, environmental and safety aspect.

Disclaimer and Link for Reference: I am 100% for green energy at heart but real field experience has forcefully shown me the only feasible way that we can generate massive power is through fossil fuels at this point in our technological evolution.

FYI It is a fact that about 50% of all electricity used in the generation of utilities, water treatment, food and bev and general manufacturing is used by rotating equipment. Read this awesome article below from 2013. While efficinces of machines have gotten betternit has not been that dramatic honestly:

https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=13431

COAL – It is the worse of the worse. Horrible or the ground water. Extracting and storing coal is incredibly messy. I actually think the emissions at a power plant level are the easiest thing to manage. There is a huge market pertaining to Acid Mine Drainage that people are unaware of. The thousands of mines under our feet are constantly creating water table issues that. Eventually it makes its way to the surface. Often these locations are remote and the only way to get power to treat these locations is via a diesel generator which a VERY filthy method of energy exertion onsidering the unfilters emmissions that happen with a relatively inefficient means of power generation.

NATURAL GAS – I believe at this point this may be the best overall method of producing energy at this point. Regulations have significantly cleaned up the extraction process both from a water table and emmissions standpoint. They key here is that the extraction process can be easily isolated to areas of work vs coal. The sugar on top is it burns roughly 99% clean vs other fossil fuels. The biggest issue is the diesel trucks and generators that are running in remote areas n the field. There has been new tech out there trying to locally “dry” and treat natural gas to use as the fuel for thier remote equipment which gives this market further improvement. That would not happen if it weren’t for environmental regs though so kudos to the gov on that one!

Nuclear – Not an area I have been hugely involved in but I can say it is a dangerous means of power generation. When it goes bad it’s not easy to deal with and the extraction of radioactive materials is a nasty one! Great for clean energy though at least from an emmission standpoint!

WIND – The wind turbines produce shockingly low power generation and they have huge maintenance costs. When comparing a 30 turbine wind farm that produces 90mw vs say a much geographically smaller gas plant 1000mw it becomes obvious. New York City has exactly zero chance of being powered by wind. A very sad fact…

HYDRO – Again I am a huge fan of clean energy and this is by far my favorite! The oils and greases that have been getting developed in the last several years are becoming water solvable which is great! While it does create more energy than wind it still limits where it can actually be implemented due to natural formations and where the water can actually be found

SOLAR – Admitted this is not a field I am heavily experienced in but I do specialize the treatment of water fallout due to mining. The removal of these volatile materials for the solar industry sounds so nasty I simply never want to go on-site to any rare earth Mine to be frank. This seems like a sad and brutal industry for 3rd world countries. It’s like taking dirty money in a way…

HYDROGEN – Okay so I love the thought of manifesting Hydrogen from water. While currently the only means to do so efficiently is the through anodes and cathodes which requires an energy bank to start, this seems like an interesting path forward. ISSUE: Talking to a fella that had to deal with properly sealing “ene’s” and “ane’s” O-rings and gaskets leak when you deal with butane, propane, ethylanes, etc. Sorry to tell you folks that Hydrogen is one of the “thinnest” gasses there is and even if made into a liquid it can go to gas very quickly. A pipe of it exposed to the summer sun can actually send it back to a gas quickly. Then it would dry run a pump or compressor which creates head and subsequent industrial accidents. It is simply a very dangerous media to handle. Until you have to deal with it you don’t know that. I am just not sure if magnetically sealed equipment will be able to meet the pressures and Temps required to transport Hydrogen either.

In summary I would like to hear the communities thoughts on this. I do have to say I have not seen too many people disproving the claims by Terrance Howard. That tells me that he may have a sniff on what a new fundamental thought on physics could be. Could people like him spur private breakthroughs?

I think this is the most exciting time to be alive!