Pacaccini VS Ubirajara: Which side are you on?

Anyone who watched the two as best friends together in the past would never have imagined that this would happen one day. Ubirajara showed a lot of conviction in the Varginha’s case. https://youtu.be/CER4GBF0bGs?si=_sN4kJt2EjgcKhD5

Recently Ubirajara Rodrigues reappeared after several years doing a live practically denying the entire case. https://youtu.be/KTS3LdvCeD0?si=sblB5OUh0UxoTziI

He thinks that the ships that people saw could be anything (not something extraterrestrial) and Doctor Venturelli could have seen any video (although I don’t know of any convincing ET video similar to Varginha’s ET that already existed in 1996) and that the bacteria that killed Marco Eli Cherese was nothing extraordinary. His main new allegations (between the lines) is that military testimonies were forged. This was reinforced by another ufologist who recently got in touch with one of the military and he said that he had invented everything for money.

but it’s not all that simple and obvious, does that mean the soldier was paid again to testify at Moment Of Contact?

Paccacini soon afterwards went live trying to refute the allegations. He maintains the same conviction as always. He said that it was no surprise to him that the soldier would deny it and that the soldier himself said to him since 1996: “I’m sorry, Paccacini, but if they ask me directly, I’ll deny it.” He also said that the tapes were recorded at Ubirajara’s own house with his camera and there was another ufologist there (Marco Petit, if I’m not mistaken, but now I’m not sure). https://www.youtube.com/live/BgQmTflG8do?si=mYJAhobXP3y-6EdU

Now it is very difficult to choose a side.