So Grusch’s whistleblowing was a sham?

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

On the 26th of June 2023, 11 months ago now, Grusch had his famous testimony. We were told there was valuable information that could be disclosed in a SCIF with clearance. Since then my perception is we’ve essentially heard nothing. Attention on this has dropped off to near zero, in my view.

Was it a sham?

Apologies if this is provocative. I’m only asking because I want disclosure to continue – if there’s something to disclose. The absence of new information coming forward under oath suggests most likely there’s nothing to disclose.

Thanks

submitted by /u/iron8832
[link] [comments]