With the failure of legislation that would have forced evidence of technology created by a non-human intelligence be brought forward, I am more certain than ever that the US government is utilizing ufology as obfuscation of their undisclosed advanced technology programs. I’m unprepared to claim that the phenomenon itself is not real, as there seems to be too much historical precedent to decide that currently, but “the program” is for me the most successful disinformation campaign ever conducted by an intelligence apparatus.
What we have is a self-perpetuating narrative that this community does all the heavy-lifting for. Imagine developing multiple unmanned, highly experimental, trans-medium craft and then wanting to test them, but realizing that if they suffer any sort of operational failure during testing, that the materials themselves or information about them could be recovered by enemy states. Stands to logic that you would want that craft to be as unidentifiable as possible. Perhaps even adding elements to it (strange glyphs, small chairs, etc.) that would throw finders of any crash debris off the scent even more. You may even have top scientists or uninformed defense contractors work with the experimental materials and give their thoughts on the ability to reverse-engineer the tech involved in the creation of the craft to ensure that you’re beyond even their comprehension when given no supplemental information. You might even let them see and run tests on a fully operational craft. This would accomplish 2 things; verification that you are well ahead of established material science and physics, and it would also create a situation where the person/entity involved could “leak” information that the gov’t has materials of unknown origin that would only benefit your disinformation campaign. This technology could be what you use to collect intelligence on other nations, explore the previously unexplored areas of your planet, and possibly be utilized as a nuclear deterrent should your nation be the target of a nuclear strike. It would be PARAMOUNT that any legitimate info about this tech not get out, and a willingness to take lethal measures to protect it would seem an obvious and patriotically motivated choice. So rather than trust that the tech can be kept secret, you simply hide it beneath the “idea” that the US gov’t has dozens of craft of non-human origin in its possession.
From there you “leak” information that proliferates the idea. You disinform certain members of your MIC and IC through fabricated evidence of this program. Every time it became too much of a topic in media you would do your best to reign it in, and most importantly, if the topic ever made it to the stage of eminent disclosure via an uninformed legislative body, you do your absolute best to quash any language that would leave you exposed to discovery of your true efforts. Over time you have to do less and less to obfuscate your tech because people are fully willing to accept that any craft they observe is of non-human origin.
This all sounds far more plausible to me than the US gov’t randomly collecting crashed vehicles of non-human origin around the world. This is not to say that there isn’t a program for crash retrieval and reverse-engineering of tech of unknown (but still human) origin, there should be no argument regarding that program’s existence, but I believe that to be as much as you will ever find in any efforts to uncover the truth about all of this. The fact is that this community benefits all involved with these advanced tech programs, and they use it as needed. Yes US congressmen and women are in collusion with private aerospace on this because it’s that important. Yes they give vague idea-proliferating-responses to questions regarding non-human intelligence tech because that narrative suits them. Essentially everything this community provides as evidence of the assumed program’s existence, can be explained by transposing this idea over the top of it.
Therefore, I’m 99% out on the coverup of anything in the US government’s possession that is factually of non-human origin. The only thing that I haven’t quite got my head around is the “biologics” bit. That’s difficult to fabricate, and any doctor that says they worked on anything more than a culture sample would be very difficult to fool. It really only leaves cloning experimentation as an explanation, and I’m not so sure they would go to those lengths just to obfuscate, but could see them folding those efforts under the same undisclosed program and using ufology again as a cover. Still though, I’m sure it’s just something I haven’t thought of and doesn’t make me think I’m off-base enough to stay in the rabbit hole.
I’ll definitely keep my ear to the streets though, in the hopes that I’m wrong…
submitted by /u/thensfwlurk
[link] [comments]