Imagine you take a 10kg bowling ball, step into a small, say 5 meter, UFO/UAP and roll the ball all the way to the other side, say 100 meters (it’s bigger inside). Now you step out of the UFO and turn it on its side,
The ball rolls out at roughly 100mph which you use to turn a turbine (think hydro-power) . You harvest that power to turn the small craft back on it’s side and repeat the process.
You could re-fill a dam with water using a similar process for hydro-power. This would be even easier if you had a door at the opposite end, but isn’t necessary.
Now lets try to poke some holes in this “free energy” outcome:
The “Arrival” Movie Solution:
It’s possible that regardless of the vertical orientation of the orientation of the small craft, when you step in, it would convert you to its horizontal frame of reference. This is what the movie Arrival shows here:
https://youtu.be/HZfhM6HGz08?si=Hbn79KE_CJ1oqj9O&t=179
Another way to think of this, is to imagine that scene, but with a door after they walk the length of the tunnel, that exits at the top of the Arrival UAPs. Ride a bike to the end and pop out at the top. Same outcome, free energy.
The third solution, is that there is an energy input requirement which equals whatever energy is extracted from the system (this is my guess if real). Grusch said a Terrawatt in his NY gathering, which may represent the limits of the system. How that failure scenario would manifest is anybody’s guess. Maybe time inside the craft slows down to keep the output power at less that a tera-watt if you’re using it to extract energy.
But what it means, is that even without understanding how it works, we could extract usable energy from a system that bends spacetime, even in the Arrival scenario, if you can put more that one door in it.
And if you have the Arrival scenario, and are limited to one door, you could use an atomic clock to look for power limitations in the system as you move increasingly more massive objects into the vehicle.
submitted by /u/mckirkus
[link] [comments]