Can someone explain to me how non-human bodies being briefed to US congressman is related to UFOs?

Related terms: ufo, flying saucer, ufos, foo fighters, orange orbs, orbs, von neumann probe, dandelion seeds, replicators, tictac, unidentified aerial phenomena, unknown flying objects, anomalous phenomena, mysterious objects, unknown vehicles, extraterrestrial vehicles, unexplained aerial phenomena, aerial anomalies, strange objects in the sky

Built with a Mix of High Quality Templates to Congress : 33%, and non template content: 67%.
You can press the prompt button again, a new template will render.

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

I was hoping someone could explain to me how non-human bodies being briefed to American congressman makes them related to UFOs.

I’ve been told since September when Mexico revealed 2 non-human bodies to their citizens and then on November when they had 15 scientists present their 6 years of research. That they weren’t related to UFOs.

I was also told it wasn’t related to UFOs when Peruvian Congress planned to fund scientific research, build a museum, and have a UFO hearing with the bodies presented to their citizens.

Please explain like I’m 5.

submitted by /u/DragonfruitOdd1989
[link] [comments] 

Read More