/u/CreditCardOnly on Travis Taylor, former scientist with the UAPTF, indicates that he & Brandon Fugal opposed eminent domain language within the UAPDA

Related terms: reality, fact, verity, truthfulness, accuracy, authenticity, honesty, sincerity, genuineness, realness, correctness, certainty, exactitude, validity, factuality, veracity, actuality, integrity, legitimacy, gospel, faithfulness, fidelity, certitude, literalness, undeniable fact, unquestionable truth, incontrovertible fact, evidence-based, objective truth, unbiased reality

Built with a Mix of High Quality Templates to Congress : 40%, and non template content: 60%.
You can press the prompt button again, a new template will render.

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

  

Christopher Sharp posted this email from Travis Taylor, allegedly claiming that Taylor and Brandon Fugal, (owner of Skinwalker Ranch), opposed the eminent domain clause in the proposed version of the UAPDA.

Sharp said this on X:

“In this leaked email, Travis Taylor, former scientist with the UAPTF, indicates that he & Brandon Fugal opposed eminent domain language within the UAPDA.Multiple sources have confirmed this to me. However, it’s essential that both Brandon and Travis retain the right to respond.”

 

Read More 

​