What if we’re actually better off not knowing NHI?

Related terms: responsibility, answerability, liability, transparency, duty, obligation, accounting, responsiveness, blameworthiness, dependability, trustworthiness, fiscal responsibility, public responsibility, ethical responsibility, integrity, accountable actions, moral responsibility, answerable, public trust, duty-bound, ownership, ethical duty, social responsibility, clear communication, transparency in actions, reliability

Built with a Mix of High Quality Templates to Congress : 33%, and non template content: 67%.
You can press the prompt button again, a new template will render.

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

There have been several recent discussions about how having a sighting/abduction experience can ‘open your mind’ to the UFO/NHI phenomenon and allow you to experience even more. If there is NHI and if it has nefarious intentions, could we be better off not “opening” ourselves up to it or seeking it out?

Is it possible that high-level people in government are actually protecting the larger population by shielding them from interaction with NHI? Just speculating.

submitted by /u/Top_Key404
[link] [comments]