So shouldn’t the majority of tech and engineering companies be wildly advocating for disclosure to have access to the tech the gov has discovered from UAP? Why aren’t they?

Related terms: law, regulation, statute, act, policy, legislation, legal framework, legislative measure, enactment, rule, legal provision, government regulation, legislative action, bill, statutory law, legislative process, constitutional law, legislative enactment, lawmaking, regulatory framework, legislative authority, legislative body, public policy, legal requirement, government law, statutory provision, legal code, legislative reform

Built with a Mix of High Quality Templates to Congress : 25%, and non template content: 75%.
You can press the prompt button again, a new template will render.

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

I’m assuming the vast majority of tech/science/etc companies are not in the gov-industrial complex, so why aren’t they all screaming for disclosure? Why have they not caught on that there is an opportunity here? Are ALL of them for non-disclosure cuz they’re also in cahoots with the gov? Surely there is a business incentive here being overlooked.

submitted by /u/wananabatermellon
[link] [comments]