So shouldn’t the majority of tech and engineering companies be wildly advocating for disclosure to have access to the tech the gov has discovered from UAP? Why aren’t they?

Related terms: general public, populace, society, community, citizenry, masses, individuals, public at large, collective, people, inhabitants, residents, common people, public interest, audience, spectators, onlookers, general populace, local community, national audience, regional audience, public sector, societal group, body of citizens, the crowd, public domain, general society, members of the public, civil society, population

Built with a Mix of High Quality Templates to Congress : 33%, and non template content: 67%.
You can press the prompt button again, a new template will render.

Generate New Template

public (1567) , uap (1561) , disclosure (1383) , ufo (1296) , transparency (1220) , government (1066) , information (1011) , disinformation (943) , ufos (919) , campaign (862) , congress (769) , people (678) , phenomena (648) , national (632) , urge (586) , issue (565) , regarding (565) , unidentified (561) , security (538) , truth (506) , american (506) , support (503) , potential (498) , know (477) , trust (469) , uaps (467) , writing (462) , accountability (461) , time (424) , scientific (410) , intelligence (381) , understanding (370) , act (363) , rep (357) , members (354) , defense (331) , action (314) , efforts (311) , research (310) , committee (309) , objects (302) , related (301) , legislation (297) , house (290) , secrecy (288) , oversight (286) , template (283) , ndaa (282) , concern (280) , being (274) ,

​

I’m assuming the vast majority of tech/science/etc companies are not in the gov-industrial complex, so why aren’t they all screaming for disclosure? Why have they not caught on that there is an opportunity here? Are ALL of them for non-disclosure cuz they’re also in cahoots with the gov? Surely there is a business incentive here being overlooked.

submitted by /u/wananabatermellon
[link] [comments] 

​Read More